The site can take a gift. It does not make giving the obvious, trustworthy next step.
Correct Donate, Summer of Need, and Donate Online on the site you have now, so gifts are not lost while you decide. A full rebuild is still the right step, with ongoing management after it. Patches leave the structure in place. We did not make a test gift. The Finances page says the charity is audited. We did not check the auditor.
Today and with us
What we photographed
Two other London homepages
Their homepages ask more clearly. Your form, once it opens, is more complete: amounts, monthly giving, and a list of programs. We did not compare income or gift counts.
Rebuilding the website around a gift
Follows the review above. You did not ask for this.
The aim is more completed donations. We will not promise a percentage. There are no visitor numbers to promise against.
Correct the three breakages now. Then rebuild. Patches leave the structure in place.
No scolding, shame, or fake urgency. Pressure that shames a visitor often makes them leave, and this audience includes people who need shelter. You approve the words.
One gift path
Ways to Give
After launch
We watch traffic and behaviour in a way that respects privacy. We do not need a list of donor names.
How it runs
A conversation to confirm the gift rules. There is no deadline. If you set the rebuild aside, the three corrections above still stand on their own.